The Impact of Accelerated Drying on Alcohol-Based Antiseptic Efficacy: A Scoping Review
Volume 10, Issue 4, Autumn 2025, Pages 747-753
https://doi.org/10.30491/hpr.2025.535440.1500
Stephanie Quon, Jake Park, Sara Wong, Katherine Zheng
Abstract Background: Alcohol-based antiseptics are widely used in clinical settings for skin disinfection prior to procedures, with efficacy dependent on both concentration and adequate wet contact time. Despite recommendations to allow antiseptics to air dry naturally, practices such as fanning or blowing are commonly used to hasten drying. The impact of such practices on antiseptic efficacy and safety remains unclear.
Objectives: To systematically map the existing literature on the effects of accelerated drying, particularly through fanning, blowing, or forced evaporation, on the antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based antiseptics used for skin disinfection.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science) and grey literature sources were searched from inception to July 2025. Eligible studies examined alcohol-based antiseptics and assessed drying methods or contact time in relation to antimicrobial efficacy. Data were synthesized thematically.
Results: Eighteen publications met inclusion criteria, comprising experimental studies, clinical guidelines, technical protocols, and reviews. Four key themes emerged: (1) Sufficient wet contact time is essential for antimicrobial efficacy; (2) Fanning or accelerated evaporation reduces microbial kill rates, particularly for Staphylococcus aureus; (3) Surgical and clinical guidelines emphasize complete natural drying due to infection and fire risk; and (4) There is a lack of clinical trials evaluating infection outcomes or real-world adherence to drying recommendations.
Conclusion: Accelerating the drying of alcohol-based antiseptics can compromise antimicrobial efficacy by shortening contact time and has no support in current guidelines. Despite its widespread use, fanning remains unvalidated and potentially harmful. There is a need for clinical research on the impact of drying practices and adherence to protocols in real-world settings.