Comparative Epidemiology of Device-Associated Infections in an Adult ICU at a Tertiary Care Center

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi-110095, India

2 Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi-110095, India

10.30491/hpr.2025.542225.1505
Abstract
Background: Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), particularly device-associated infections (DAIs) in ICUs, pose a significant global health burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
Objectives: This study aims to estimate the HAI burden by analyzing DAI rates and resistance patterns in ICU settings, contributing to evidence-based infection control strategies.
Methods: We conducted a six-month prospective observational study in the adult ICU of GTBH (July–December 2024), focusing on patients with DAIs. Incidence and device utilization rates were calculated using CDC-standardized metrics based on device and patient days.
Results: Out of 286 patients, 40 developed a total of 62 DAIs, comprising 25 cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (40.3%), 19 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CLABSI) (30.65%), and 18 cases of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) (29.03%). VAP had the highest cumulative infection rate (22.6%), followed by CLABSI (21%) and CAUTI (10.8%). Acinetobacter baumannii was the dominant isolate in VAP cases, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp. were predominant in CLABSI cases, and non-albicans Candida was the leading pathogen in CAUTI cases. Significant antimicrobial resistance was observed, especially among Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas species. Notably, the case fatality rate among DAI patients reached 57.5%.
Conclusion: In conclusion, our surveillance study highlights a substantial burden of DAIs in the ICU, with VAP being the most prevalent. The dominance of multidrug-resistant pathogens and the striking 57.5% fatality rate emphasize the urgent need for robust infection control, tailored stewardship programs, and continuous local epidemiological monitoring.

Keywords


1.       WHO. Report on the Burden of Endemic Health Care-Associated. Infection Worldwide Clean Care is Safer Care. 2011:140. Available at: https://apps.who.int/ iris/bitstream/handle/10665/80135/9789241501507_eng.pdf;sequence=1 [accessed 25 May 2025]
2.      Mehta Y, Jaggi N, Rosenthal VD, Kavathekar M, Sakle A, Munshi N, et al. Device-associated infection rates in 20 cities of India, data summary for 2004–2013: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(2):172-81. doi:10.1017/ice.2015.276
3.     Storr J, Twyman A, Zingg W, Damani N, Kilpatrick C, Reilly J, et al. Core components for effective infection prevention and control programmes: new WHO evidence-based recommendations. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6(1):6. doi:10.1186/s13756-016-0149-9
4.       Hebden JN. Rationale for accuracy and consistency in applying standardized definitions for surveillance of health care–associated infections. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(5):S29-31. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.009
5.       Stempliuk V. Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: From the Need to a Reality. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2018;10(1):1-6. doi:10.1007/s40506-018-0148-x
6.       Antimicrobial Resistance Research & Surveillance Network. Annual report. January 2023- December 2023. Available at https://www.icmr.gov.in/ icmrobject/uploads/Documents/1725536060_annual_report_2023.pdf [accessed 26 May 2025]
7.       Mathur P, Malpiedi P, Walia K, Srikantiah P, Gupta S, Lohiya A, et al. Health-care-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections in a network of hospitals in India: a multicentre, hospital-based, prospective surveillance study. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(9): e1317-25. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00274-1
8.       National Centre for Disease Control, India. Standard operating procedures: surveillance of priority bacterial pathogens under the national AMR surveillance network. Delhi: National Centre for Disease Control, 2019.
9.       Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Healthcare Safety Network Patient Safety Component Manual. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022.
10.     CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0196655308001673. [accessed 20 April 2025]
11.     Performance standards for antimicrobial testing. 34th ed, CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA; 2024.
12.     Bhushan D, Hegde AV, Kumar V, Thakuria B, Kumar P, Sudheer Varma Y. Prevalence of device associated hospital acquired infection in a medical intensive care unit of a tertiary care centre. J Antimicrob Stewardsh Pract Infect Dis. 2024;2:46-52. doi:10.62541/jaspi056
13.     Zirpe KG, Gurav SK, Dhawad PA, Tiwari AM, Deshmukh AM, Suryawanshi PB, et al. Hospital-acquired infections in the adult intensive care unit: Epidemiology, resistance patterns, and risk factors. J Assoc Physicians India. 2025;73(2):51-5.
14.     Srivastava R, Mahajan S, Kakru DK. Clinico-microbiological profile of Acinetobacter baumannii infections in a tertiary care hospital in Greater Noida. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2024;6(2):517-20.
15.     Singhal E, Singh R, Bhardwaj P, Kumari M. Candida species in catheter associated urinary tract infection in ICU patients at a tertiary care hospital in North India: An observational study. J Med Sci Res. 2024;12:11-5. doi:10.17727/JMSR.2024/12-2
16.  Murhekar MV, Kumar CG. Health-care-associated infection surveillance in India. The Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(9):e1222-3. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x (22)00317-5

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 30 March 2026